Back to News & Insights
Artificial Intelligence October 6, 2026 · 8 min read

Ontological Shock at Altitude

Rocky Mountain Ruby 2026 in Boulder was two days, one track, and a lot of AI. Nearly every talk still found its way back to the people doing the work.

Ontological Shock at Altitude

Travis Turner closed the first day of Rocky Mountain Ruby with a term I hadn't heard before: ontological shock. It's what happens when something new fundamentally disturbs your sense of being, and he argued that programmers are feeling it right now. The worries about job duties, tooling, and job security sit downstream of it. The next afternoon, Alan Ridlehoover used the same phrase in the closing keynote to describe his own work. By then it felt like the name for the whole conference.

Rocky Mountain Ruby is two days and a single track in Boulder, Colorado. This year, and in previous ones, it has been at eTown Hall, a multi-purpose building in the heart of downtown Boulder, a short walk from Pearl Street. It's a former church, and it just reeks of cool.

Most of the talks were about AI in some way, and they kept coming back to people. Andrea told us not to let an agent get to know our team for us. Giovanni said the biggest quality win in his RAG app was string handling. That's the thread I followed through the schedule.

I flew Southwest from Omaha to Denver, then hopped on the bus from Denver to Boulder. I love that option. The bus is very convenient, I love making use of public transit, and it's so much less stress than renting a car. Once I got to my basecamp (a wink at my actual hotel, Basecamp Boulder), I hit the Chautauqua Trail and the meadow. So pretty. So scenic. And wow, the Flatirons.

There are many, many coffee shops around the venue. I tried six different ones in four days, and none of them were a big chain.

Drew Bragg does more than game shows, though his game shows are awesome. Your own AI Agent in ~400 lines of Ruby was live coding, with webhooks galore. The code is on GitHub if you want to build along.

Giovanni Panasiti showed Building an Agentic RAG in the Rails Way with RubyLLM, and the whole AI stack fits in a Gemfile. The part that most improves answer quality is plain string handling: chunking that respects headers, article numbers, and tables. As he asked the room, do you think you need Python or some fancy language to handle strings? Rails developers are not second-class citizens in the AI conversation.

It's always nice to see Kevin Murphy's InstiLLMent of Successful Practices in an Agentic World again. I loved it at Blue Ridge Ruby, and I'm always happy to be part of Hours Unlimited, the fictional company in his talk where we all start as new hires. Kevin wrote his own Rocky Mountain Ruby recap too, so go read his take.

Andrea Fomera brought slick HTML slides to High-Octane Onboarding: Ramping into a Rails Codebase with AI Agents and one big question: how do you onboard quickly and become effective, and can AI speed that up? Her answer: onboarding may be the most useful moment to have an AI agent, so use it for that. Just don't let it do the part where you get to know your team.

Ifat Ribon's Fewer Tests, More Confidence: A Rails Testing Philosophy for the AI Era started from a simple point: AI can generate more tests, but not always better tests. Every test has a cost, in slower feedback loops, heavier CI usage, and more cognitive load for the developers who have to understand, maintain, and trust the suite. Her first principle is to test behavior, not implementation: skip testing library and language code, focus on public methods and their results, and make sure tests still pass after a refactor. Then she turned to the agent itself. Bolster the AI harness with rules that codify hard constraints and conventions, and with deterministic tools like code scanning and coverage that objectively verify what the suite actually catches. Great slides, too, and so easy to follow along with.

Travis Turner's Got AI ontological shock? No worries: UFOs, Theology, and Psychedelics with Ruby-Colored Reverence closed day one. It was a manic pixie dream guy of a talk. His premise, from the abstract, is that we're all coming to terms with this shock in different ways and at different times, so we're not on the same page. He named the shared experience, the blocks to coping with it, and some frameworks for working through it. Yes, it got deep.

Nicolas Erlichman's Modeling Class Hierarchies in Active Record made the case for delegated types, which still aren't widely known (by humans, anyway). Before them, Active Record offered two ways to model inheritance: single-table inheritance and polymorphic associations. Delegated types give you unified queries, clean schemas with no table bloat, and a model that scales naturally as new types appear.

Fernando Perales opened Slowly We Rot: signs of a Rails app's decay with a question. When was the last time you ran your entire test suite locally? All of it. His takeaways: rot is gradual, not catastrophic. Preserve your ability to change the system. Make trade-offs explicit, and revisit them. And in high school we were allowed to ignore friction, but software teams don't get that.

Marco Roth has so, so many gems. In Herb in Rails 8.2: Your ERB views, now HTML-aware, he walked a full room through Herb's path to becoming an opt-in view engine in Rails 8.2: how the integration came together, how ActionView was adapted and extended, and the toolchain and dev tools every Rails developer gets out of the box as a result.

Sonja Peterson's Confident On-Call: Building Incident Response Skills as a Ruby Engineer argued that being confident on-call is a learnable skill, not a personality trait. Incident response takes a lot of different forms, but certain skills and knowledge always stay relevant. Do a daily review so you know what normal looks like in your system, and get comfortable with what you can observe from the command line.

Joel Hawksley's Beyond Senior: Consider the staff path! says your path to staff should begin with staff behaviors long before you go up for promotion. My favorite part was the rope analogy GitHub uses for technical depth: Junior: learns about rope Mid: can tie basic knots Senior: calculates rope strength, knows a lot about knots Staff: understands rope making Principal: knows more about rope than you ever will Distinguished: invented nylon

Ben Reubenstein's Commit for Good covered his adventures as a consultant and the software he has built for nonprofits along the way. He shared a quote from Tom Kimball: "At some point in each of our lives we get exposed to the importance of getting involved and giving back." For Byrne & Denver Urban Scholars, from 2011 to 2014, that looked like registration, payments, team pages, and leaderboards. His pitch: write some Ruby, help a nonprofit, be part of your community, and help build a better spreadsheet. You will get more out of it than you give.

I gave Optimize Your Mindset (Without Overclocking) on day two. It tells the story of four people and four research-backed techniques to level up your work and life: mindfulness for breaking thought loops and managing stress, growth mindset for embracing challenges and continuous learning, habit building for sustainable change, and deep work strategies for keeping focus in a distracted world. None of them involve code. With so much going on right now, having ways to cope helps. The references are up if you want to dig in.

Want to discuss this further?

Book a free strategy call with our team to see how these insights apply to your specific business goals.

Book a consultation